Layout of Watershed Ecological Buffer System Aiming at Water Quality Improvement in the Yangtze River Economic Belt
-
摘要:
生态缓冲带能够有效减缓流域内的人类活动或自然过程对水环境和水生态系统的影响.在长江经济带构建流域生态缓冲体系,对长江生态保护修复具有十分重要的意义.讨论了构建流域生态缓冲体系涉及的生态缓冲带位置选择、缓冲体系所占最低面积比率、宽度划定等一些基本的原则要求;利用卫星遥感影像数据,提取各汇水单元的地形特征、土地利用类型特征、土壤类型、土壤侵蚀强度、水文水系等数据,对长江经济带流域生态缓冲体系进行布局.结果表明:①长江经济带内林草地是主要土地利用类型,占区域总面积的62.46%,但是分布很不均匀,主要集中在西部高地和中下游的丘陵地带,在人口密集、农田密集的区域分布偏少;城镇用地主要集中在长江中下游地区.②土壤类型空间差异显著,浙江省、江苏省、湖南省、江西省及安徽省大部分区域的土壤多是黏性比较大,污染物迁移能力较低;而污染物迁移能力较强的砂质土或者土层较薄的山地草甸土主要分布在四川省北部、西北部.水力侵蚀、风力侵蚀和冻融侵蚀均有分布,且以水力侵蚀为主,建议在中度及以上侵蚀强度区域尽量减少污染源,重点布置缓冲带,增加该区域的缓冲力度.③长江经济带范围内可以利用的中小型湿地、小型河流支浜的面积至少有1.4×104 km2,再结合林草缓冲带,就可以形成一个生态缓冲体系.④在土地利用类型分布结果基础上,叠加土壤侵蚀强度和水系分布,将污染源区、中度及以上侵蚀强度区、水体区作为缓冲对象,建立缓冲体系的重点区域,总面积约14.26×104 km2,占长江经济带总面积的6.95%.对照欧美地区的研究,6.95%的缓冲体系面积占比是偏低的,需要在长江经济带开展深入研究来确定适宜的缓冲体系面积比,推进长江经济带流域生态缓冲体系的构建.
Abstract:Ecological buffer zone can effectively buffer or reduce the impact of human activities or natural processes on the water environment and water ecosystems. In order to protect and restore the Yangtze River enviornment, it is of great significance to construct an ecological buffer system at the watershed level with various buffers as the main body. The concept of watershed ecological buffer system is put forward in the paper, and the principles of setting watershed ecological buffer system from the aspects of the location selection, the minimum area ratio in the whole watershed, and the delimitation of the width of ecological buffer zone, are elaborated. Based on the water environment target of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, using satellite remote sensing image data such as topography characteristics, land use type characteristics, soil type, soil erosion intensity, hydrological system, etc., to study the layout of the ecological buffer system in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. The results show that: (1) In the Yangtze River Economic Belt, forest-grassland is the main land use type, accounting for 62.46% of the total area, but forests and grasslands are distributed unevenly, mainly in the western highlands and the hilly areas of the middle and lower reaches, but in the densely populated and farmland intensive areas, they are relatively low. The urban land is mainly concentrated in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River. (2) The spatial distribution of soil types is significant difference. Most soils in Zhejiang Province, Jiangsu Province, Hunan Province, Jiangxi Province and Anhui Province are relatively cohesive, with low migration ability for pollutants. Sandy soils with strong migration ability of pollutants or the mountain meadow soils with too thin soil layer are mainly distributed in the north and northwest of Sichuan. Hydraulic erosion, wind erosion and freeze-thaw erosion are all found in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, and hydraulic erosion is the dominat type. In areas with moderate and higher erosion, buffer zones should be setup to reduce pollution transfer. (3) This study shows that there are at least 14, 000 km2 of small and medium-sized wetlands and small rivers in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, which can form an organic combined ecological buffer system by combining these buffer elements with the forest and grass buffer zones. (4) The key area of the watershed buffer zone is about 142, 600 km2, accounting for 6.95% of the total area of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, which inludes the buffer zones around lakes and reservoirs, farmland and towns, erodible areas and areas where pollutants are easy to migrate. Compared with the research of European and American countries, 6.95% of the buffer system area is relatively low. It is necessary to carry out in-depth research in the Yangtze River Economic Belt to determine the appropriate buffer system area ratio, and carry out pilot demonstration, improve the coverage of the river basin ecological buffer system in the Yangtze River Economic Belt according to local conditions, and promote the construction of the river basin ecological buffer system in the Yangtze River Economic Belt.
-
-
[1] 叶春, 李春华, 邓婷婷.湖泊缓冲带功能、建设与管理[J].环境科学研究, 2013, 26(12):1283-1289. http://www.hjkxyj.org.cn/hjkxyj/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20131204&flag=1YE Chun, LI Chunhua, DENG Tingting.Study on the function, construction and management of lake buffer zones[J].Research of Environmental Sciences, 2013, 26(12):1283-1289. http://www.hjkxyj.org.cn/hjkxyj/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20131204&flag=1 [2] United Kingdom Rural Payments Agency.GAEC 1-establishment of buffer strips along watercourses[R].London: United Kingdom Rural Payments Agency, 2016. [3] 曾立雄, 黄志霖, 肖文发, 等.河岸植被缓冲带的功能及其设计与管理[J].林业科学, 2010, 46(2):128-133. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/lykx201002021ZENG Lixiong, HUANG Zhilin, XIAO Wenfa, et al.Function design and management of riparian vergetation buffer strips[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2010, 46(2):128-133. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/lykx201002021 [4] MANDER V, HAYAKAWA Y, KUUSEMETS V.Purification processes, ecological functions, planning and design of riparian buffer zones in agricultural watersheds[J].Ecological Engineering, 2005, 24(5):421-432. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.01.015 [5] 林怡, 季昊巍.流域植被缓冲带分析及其生态评价[J].浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(8):1358-1364. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2017.08.18LIN Yi, JI Haowei.Analysis of vegetation buffer in river basin and its ecological evaluation[J].Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2017, 29(8):1358-1364. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2017.08.18 [6] 何娟.黄浦江上游河岸带生态系统健康评价及调控管理探讨[D].上海: 华东师范大学, 2016. [7] LEE P, SMYTH C, BOUTIN S.Quantitative review of riparian buffer width guidelines from Canada and the United States[J].Journal of Environmental Management, 2004, 70(2):165-180. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=c02aee325a02427f3055b96549f55fb8&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [8] 叶春, 金相灿, 王临清, 等.洱海湖滨带生态修复设计原则与工程模式[J].中国环境科学, 2004, 24(6):717-721. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6923.2004.06.018YE Chun, JIN Xiangcan, WANG Linqing, et al.Design principle and engineering mode of the ecological restoration in the aquatic-terrestrial ecotone of Erhai Lake[J].China Environmental Science, 2004, 24(6):717-721. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6923.2004.06.018 [9] 王华玲, 赵建伟, 程东升, 等.不同植被缓冲带对坡耕地地表径流中氮磷的拦截效果[J].农业环境科学学报, 2010, 29(9):1730-1736. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/nyhjbh201009017WANG Hualing, ZHAO Jianwei, CHENG Dongshen, et al.Nitrogen and phosphorous removal efficiency of different vegetative buffer strips on surface runoff from sloping land[J].Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2010, 29(9):1730-1736. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/nyhjbh201009017 [10] 李春江, 叶春, 李春华, 等.太湖湖泊缓冲带不同类型草林复合系统中氮、磷的溶出与沉降特征[J].环境污染与防治, 2015, 37(2):42-46. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hjwryfz201502008LI Chunjiang, YE Chun, LI Chunhua, et al.Characteristics of N, P dissolution and deposition in different types of grass-tree complex system in Taihu lake buffer[J].Environmental Pollution & Control, 2015, 37(2):42-46. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hjwryfz201502008 [11] LI Chunhua, WANG Yakong, YE Chun, et al.A proposed delineation method for lake buffer zones in watersheds dominated by non-point source pollution[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 660:32-39. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.468 [12] MARIA N R, ANTONIO L, MONICA G, et al.Agricultural land use and best management practices to control nonpoint water pollution[J].Environmental Management, 2006, 38(2):253-266. doi: 10.1007/s00267-004-0344-y [13] VOUGHT B M, PINAY G, FUGLSANG A, et al.Structure and function of buffer strips from a water quality perspective in agricultural landscapes[J].Landscape and Urban Planning, 1995, 31(1/2/3):323-331. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=befb5dfb936652e0b5804a2becfefb8d&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [14] VIDON P, ALLAN C, BURNS D, et al.Hot spots and hot moments in riparian zones:potential for improved water quality management[J].Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2010, 46(2):278-298. doi: 10.1111-j.1752-1688.2010.00420.x/ [15] 秦明周.美国土地利用的生物环境保护工程措施:缓冲带[J].水土保持学报, 2001, 15(1):119-121. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2001.01.032QIN Mingzhou.Biological environment measures of united states land uses:buffer strips[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2001, 15(1):119-121. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2001.01.032 [16] NIELSEN A, TROLLE D, SONDERGAARD M, et al.Watershed land use effects on lake water quality in Denmark[J].Ecological Applications, 2012, 22(4):1187-1200. doi: 10.1890/11-1831.1 [17] 杨桂山, 徐昔保, 李平星.长江经济带绿色生态廊道建设研究[J].地理科学进展, 2015, 34(11):1356-1367. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dlkxjz201511003YANG Guishan, XU Xibao, LI Pingxing.Research on the construction of green ecological corridors in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J].Progress in Geography, 2015, 34(11):1356-1367. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dlkxjz201511003 [18] BENTRUP G.Conservation buffer zone: buffer zone, ecological corridor and green channel design guidline[R].Asheville, USA: National Agroforestry Center, 2008. [19] HAYCOCK N, BURT T, GOULDING K, et al.Buffer zones: their processes and potential in water protection[R].Harpenden, UK: Quest Environmental, 1997: 21-32. [20] WOESSNER W W.Stream and fluvial plain ground water interactions:rescaling hydrogeologic thought[J].Ground Water, 2000, 38:423-429. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2000.tb00228.x [21] CORELL D L.Principles of planning and establishment of buffer zones[J].Ecological Engineering, 2005, 24:433-439. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.01.007 [22] SLIVA L, DUDLEY W D.Buffer zone versus whole catchment approaches to studying land use impact on river water quality[J].Water Research, 2001, 35(14):3462-3472. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00062-8 [23] 童坤, 孙伟, 陈雯.长江经济带水环境保护及治理政策比较研究[J].区域与全球发展, 2019(1):5-16.TONG Kun, SUN Wei, CHEN Wen.Comparative study of water environment protection and governance policies on the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J].Area Studies and Global Development, 2019(1):5-16. [24] LAMBIN E F, GEIST H J.Land-use and land-cover change:local processes and global impacts[M].Berlin:Springer, 2006. [25] ARHEIMER B, LIDÉN R.Nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations from agricultural catchments:influence of spatial and temporal variables[J].Journal of Hydrology, 2000, 227(1/2/3/4):140-159. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=36037cac808a2e30d262204370472199&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [26] OSBORNE L L, WILEY M J.Empirical relationships between land-use cover and stream water-quality in an agricultural watershed[J].Journal of Environmental Management, 1988, 26(1):9-27. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=85f42899417d043a2f8adc4ad3a4f476&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [27] 曹成林, 孙永福, 宋玉鹏, 等.粘性类土侵蚀强度量化研究[J].海岸工程, 2010(4):65-72. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3682.2010.04.009CAO Chenglin, SUN Yongfu, SONG Yupeng, et al.Quantitative study on clayey soil erosional properties[J].Coastal Engineering, 2010(4):65-72. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3682.2010.04.009 -