留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

关于在长江经济带布局以水质改善为目标的流域生态缓冲体系的思考

李春华 叶春 高尚超 魏伟伟 郑烨

李春华, 叶春, 高尚超, 魏伟伟, 郑烨. 关于在长江经济带布局以水质改善为目标的流域生态缓冲体系的思考[J]. 环境科学研究, 2020, 33(5): 1206-1213. doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2020.05.10
引用本文: 李春华, 叶春, 高尚超, 魏伟伟, 郑烨. 关于在长江经济带布局以水质改善为目标的流域生态缓冲体系的思考[J]. 环境科学研究, 2020, 33(5): 1206-1213. doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2020.05.10
LI Chunhua, YE Chun, GAO Shangchao, WEI Weiwei, ZHENG Ye. Layout of Watershed Ecological Buffer System Aiming at Water Quality Improvement in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2020, 33(5): 1206-1213. doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2020.05.10
Citation: LI Chunhua, YE Chun, GAO Shangchao, WEI Weiwei, ZHENG Ye. Layout of Watershed Ecological Buffer System Aiming at Water Quality Improvement in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2020, 33(5): 1206-1213. doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2020.05.10

关于在长江经济带布局以水质改善为目标的流域生态缓冲体系的思考

doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2020.05.10
基金项目: 

国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项 2012ZX07101-009

长江干流及典型城市环境保护综合方案与管理平台研究项目 2019-LHYJ-10-0211

详细信息
    作者简介:

    李春华(1977-), 女, 山东潍坊人, 研究员, 博士, 主要从事湖泊生态修复理论与技术研究, 297535203@qq.com

    通讯作者:

    叶春(1970-), 男, 江西九江人, 研究员, 博士, 主要从事湖泊富营养化治理和生态恢复理论与技术研究, yechbj@163.com

  • 中图分类号: X171

Layout of Watershed Ecological Buffer System Aiming at Water Quality Improvement in the Yangtze River Economic Belt

Funds: 

National Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment, China 2012ZX07101-009

Research Project of Comprehensive Scheme and Management Platform for Environmental Protection of Yangtze River Mainstream and Typical Cities, China 2019-LHYJ-10-0211

  • 摘要:

    生态缓冲带能够有效减缓流域内的人类活动或自然过程对水环境和水生态系统的影响.在长江经济带构建流域生态缓冲体系,对长江生态保护修复具有十分重要的意义.讨论了构建流域生态缓冲体系涉及的生态缓冲带位置选择、缓冲体系所占最低面积比率、宽度划定等一些基本的原则要求;利用卫星遥感影像数据,提取各汇水单元的地形特征、土地利用类型特征、土壤类型、土壤侵蚀强度、水文水系等数据,对长江经济带流域生态缓冲体系进行布局.结果表明:①长江经济带内林草地是主要土地利用类型,占区域总面积的62.46%,但是分布很不均匀,主要集中在西部高地和中下游的丘陵地带,在人口密集、农田密集的区域分布偏少;城镇用地主要集中在长江中下游地区.②土壤类型空间差异显著,浙江省、江苏省、湖南省、江西省及安徽省大部分区域的土壤多是黏性比较大,污染物迁移能力较低;而污染物迁移能力较强的砂质土或者土层较薄的山地草甸土主要分布在四川省北部、西北部.水力侵蚀、风力侵蚀和冻融侵蚀均有分布,且以水力侵蚀为主,建议在中度及以上侵蚀强度区域尽量减少污染源,重点布置缓冲带,增加该区域的缓冲力度.③长江经济带范围内可以利用的中小型湿地、小型河流支浜的面积至少有1.4×104 km2,再结合林草缓冲带,就可以形成一个生态缓冲体系.④在土地利用类型分布结果基础上,叠加土壤侵蚀强度和水系分布,将污染源区、中度及以上侵蚀强度区、水体区作为缓冲对象,建立缓冲体系的重点区域,总面积约14.26×104 km2,占长江经济带总面积的6.95%.对照欧美地区的研究,6.95%的缓冲体系面积占比是偏低的,需要在长江经济带开展深入研究来确定适宜的缓冲体系面积比,推进长江经济带流域生态缓冲体系的构建.

     

  • 图  1  长江经济带土地利用类型分布

    Figure  1.  Distribution of land use types in the Yangze River Economic Belt

    图  2  长江经济带高程分布

    Figure  2.  Elevation distribution map of Yangtze River Economic Belt

    图  3  长江经济带土壤类型分布

    Figure  3.  Distribution of soil types in the Yangtze River Economic Belt

    图  4  长江经济带土壤侵蚀强度分布

    Figure  4.  Distribution of soil erosion intensity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt

    图  5  长江经济带流域缓冲体系重点区域布局

    Figure  5.  Layout of key regions in the watershed buffer system of Yangtze River Economic Belt

  • [1] 叶春, 李春华, 邓婷婷.湖泊缓冲带功能、建设与管理[J].环境科学研究, 2013, 26(12):1283-1289. http://www.hjkxyj.org.cn/hjkxyj/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20131204&flag=1

    YE Chun, LI Chunhua, DENG Tingting.Study on the function, construction and management of lake buffer zones[J].Research of Environmental Sciences, 2013, 26(12):1283-1289. http://www.hjkxyj.org.cn/hjkxyj/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20131204&flag=1
    [2] United Kingdom Rural Payments Agency.GAEC 1-establishment of buffer strips along watercourses[R].London: United Kingdom Rural Payments Agency, 2016.
    [3] 曾立雄, 黄志霖, 肖文发, 等.河岸植被缓冲带的功能及其设计与管理[J].林业科学, 2010, 46(2):128-133. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/lykx201002021

    ZENG Lixiong, HUANG Zhilin, XIAO Wenfa, et al.Function design and management of riparian vergetation buffer strips[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2010, 46(2):128-133. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/lykx201002021
    [4] MANDER V, HAYAKAWA Y, KUUSEMETS V.Purification processes, ecological functions, planning and design of riparian buffer zones in agricultural watersheds[J].Ecological Engineering, 2005, 24(5):421-432. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.01.015
    [5] 林怡, 季昊巍.流域植被缓冲带分析及其生态评价[J].浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(8):1358-1364. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2017.08.18

    LIN Yi, JI Haowei.Analysis of vegetation buffer in river basin and its ecological evaluation[J].Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2017, 29(8):1358-1364. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2017.08.18
    [6] 何娟.黄浦江上游河岸带生态系统健康评价及调控管理探讨[D].上海: 华东师范大学, 2016.
    [7] LEE P, SMYTH C, BOUTIN S.Quantitative review of riparian buffer width guidelines from Canada and the United States[J].Journal of Environmental Management, 2004, 70(2):165-180. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=c02aee325a02427f3055b96549f55fb8&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
    [8] 叶春, 金相灿, 王临清, 等.洱海湖滨带生态修复设计原则与工程模式[J].中国环境科学, 2004, 24(6):717-721. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6923.2004.06.018

    YE Chun, JIN Xiangcan, WANG Linqing, et al.Design principle and engineering mode of the ecological restoration in the aquatic-terrestrial ecotone of Erhai Lake[J].China Environmental Science, 2004, 24(6):717-721. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6923.2004.06.018
    [9] 王华玲, 赵建伟, 程东升, 等.不同植被缓冲带对坡耕地地表径流中氮磷的拦截效果[J].农业环境科学学报, 2010, 29(9):1730-1736. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/nyhjbh201009017

    WANG Hualing, ZHAO Jianwei, CHENG Dongshen, et al.Nitrogen and phosphorous removal efficiency of different vegetative buffer strips on surface runoff from sloping land[J].Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2010, 29(9):1730-1736. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/nyhjbh201009017
    [10] 李春江, 叶春, 李春华, 等.太湖湖泊缓冲带不同类型草林复合系统中氮、磷的溶出与沉降特征[J].环境污染与防治, 2015, 37(2):42-46. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hjwryfz201502008

    LI Chunjiang, YE Chun, LI Chunhua, et al.Characteristics of N, P dissolution and deposition in different types of grass-tree complex system in Taihu lake buffer[J].Environmental Pollution & Control, 2015, 37(2):42-46. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hjwryfz201502008
    [11] LI Chunhua, WANG Yakong, YE Chun, et al.A proposed delineation method for lake buffer zones in watersheds dominated by non-point source pollution[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 660:32-39. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.468
    [12] MARIA N R, ANTONIO L, MONICA G, et al.Agricultural land use and best management practices to control nonpoint water pollution[J].Environmental Management, 2006, 38(2):253-266. doi: 10.1007/s00267-004-0344-y
    [13] VOUGHT B M, PINAY G, FUGLSANG A, et al.Structure and function of buffer strips from a water quality perspective in agricultural landscapes[J].Landscape and Urban Planning, 1995, 31(1/2/3):323-331. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=befb5dfb936652e0b5804a2becfefb8d&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
    [14] VIDON P, ALLAN C, BURNS D, et al.Hot spots and hot moments in riparian zones:potential for improved water quality management[J].Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2010, 46(2):278-298. doi: 10.1111-j.1752-1688.2010.00420.x/
    [15] 秦明周.美国土地利用的生物环境保护工程措施:缓冲带[J].水土保持学报, 2001, 15(1):119-121. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2001.01.032

    QIN Mingzhou.Biological environment measures of united states land uses:buffer strips[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2001, 15(1):119-121. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2001.01.032
    [16] NIELSEN A, TROLLE D, SONDERGAARD M, et al.Watershed land use effects on lake water quality in Denmark[J].Ecological Applications, 2012, 22(4):1187-1200. doi: 10.1890/11-1831.1
    [17] 杨桂山, 徐昔保, 李平星.长江经济带绿色生态廊道建设研究[J].地理科学进展, 2015, 34(11):1356-1367. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dlkxjz201511003

    YANG Guishan, XU Xibao, LI Pingxing.Research on the construction of green ecological corridors in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J].Progress in Geography, 2015, 34(11):1356-1367. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dlkxjz201511003
    [18] BENTRUP G.Conservation buffer zone: buffer zone, ecological corridor and green channel design guidline[R].Asheville, USA: National Agroforestry Center, 2008.
    [19] HAYCOCK N, BURT T, GOULDING K, et al.Buffer zones: their processes and potential in water protection[R].Harpenden, UK: Quest Environmental, 1997: 21-32.
    [20] WOESSNER W W.Stream and fluvial plain ground water interactions:rescaling hydrogeologic thought[J].Ground Water, 2000, 38:423-429. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2000.tb00228.x
    [21] CORELL D L.Principles of planning and establishment of buffer zones[J].Ecological Engineering, 2005, 24:433-439. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.01.007
    [22] SLIVA L, DUDLEY W D.Buffer zone versus whole catchment approaches to studying land use impact on river water quality[J].Water Research, 2001, 35(14):3462-3472. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00062-8
    [23] 童坤, 孙伟, 陈雯.长江经济带水环境保护及治理政策比较研究[J].区域与全球发展, 2019(1):5-16.

    TONG Kun, SUN Wei, CHEN Wen.Comparative study of water environment protection and governance policies on the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J].Area Studies and Global Development, 2019(1):5-16.
    [24] LAMBIN E F, GEIST H J.Land-use and land-cover change:local processes and global impacts[M].Berlin:Springer, 2006.
    [25] ARHEIMER B, LIDÉN R.Nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations from agricultural catchments:influence of spatial and temporal variables[J].Journal of Hydrology, 2000, 227(1/2/3/4):140-159. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=36037cac808a2e30d262204370472199&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
    [26] OSBORNE L L, WILEY M J.Empirical relationships between land-use cover and stream water-quality in an agricultural watershed[J].Journal of Environmental Management, 1988, 26(1):9-27. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=85f42899417d043a2f8adc4ad3a4f476&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
    [27] 曹成林, 孙永福, 宋玉鹏, 等.粘性类土侵蚀强度量化研究[J].海岸工程, 2010(4):65-72. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3682.2010.04.009

    CAO Chenglin, SUN Yongfu, SONG Yupeng, et al.Quantitative study on clayey soil erosional properties[J].Coastal Engineering, 2010(4):65-72. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3682.2010.04.009
  • 加载中
图(5)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  779
  • HTML全文浏览量:  37
  • PDF下载量:  432
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-01-28
  • 修回日期:  2020-02-29
  • 刊出日期:  2020-05-25

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回