留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

重点行业/领域碳达峰路径研究方法

蔡博峰 吕晨 董金池 汪旭颖 郑逸璇 李新 王雪松 李冰 何捷 李永亮 吴立新 邵朱强 丁焰 徐伟 雷宇 严刚

蔡博峰, 吕晨, 董金池, 汪旭颖, 郑逸璇, 李新, 王雪松, 李冰, 何捷, 李永亮, 吴立新, 邵朱强, 丁焰, 徐伟, 雷宇, 严刚. 重点行业/领域碳达峰路径研究方法[J]. 环境科学研究, 2022, 35(2): 320-328. doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2021.11.05
引用本文: 蔡博峰, 吕晨, 董金池, 汪旭颖, 郑逸璇, 李新, 王雪松, 李冰, 何捷, 李永亮, 吴立新, 邵朱强, 丁焰, 徐伟, 雷宇, 严刚. 重点行业/领域碳达峰路径研究方法[J]. 环境科学研究, 2022, 35(2): 320-328. doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2021.11.05
CAI Bofeng, LÜ Chen, DONG Jinchi, WANG Xuying, ZHENG Yixuan, LI Xin, WANG Xuesong, LI Bing, HE Jie, LI Yongliang, WU Lixin, SHAO Zhuqiang, DING Yan, XU Wei, LEI Yu, YAN Gang. Research Method for Carbon Peaking Pathway in Key Industries/Sectors[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(2): 320-328. doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2021.11.05
Citation: CAI Bofeng, LÜ Chen, DONG Jinchi, WANG Xuying, ZHENG Yixuan, LI Xin, WANG Xuesong, LI Bing, HE Jie, LI Yongliang, WU Lixin, SHAO Zhuqiang, DING Yan, XU Wei, LEI Yu, YAN Gang. Research Method for Carbon Peaking Pathway in Key Industries/Sectors[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2022, 35(2): 320-328. doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2021.11.05

重点行业/领域碳达峰路径研究方法

doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2021.11.05
基金项目: 中国工程院战略研究与咨询项目(No.2021-01JXZD-06)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    蔡博峰(1977-),男,陕西宝鸡人,研究员,博士,主要从事温室气体清单研究,caibf@caep.org.cn

    通讯作者:

    严刚(1976-),男,辽宁普兰店人,研究员,博士,主要从事大气环境管理、环境规划、温室气体排放控制、总量控制与排污交易等研究,yangang@caep.org.cn

  • 中图分类号: X24

Research Method for Carbon Peaking Pathway in Key Industries/Sectors

Funds: Strategic Research and Consulting Project of Chinese Academy of Engineering (No.2021-01JXZD-06)
  • 摘要: 区域化石能源消费量与碳排放量往往集中于少数高能耗、高排放的重点行业和领域. 重点行业/领域的产业规模、能源结构和碳排放变化直接决定区域碳排放达峰时间、达峰质量和峰值大小. 研究重点行业/领域碳达峰路径,是实现碳排放分区管控、落实行业减排责任和推动区域碳排放总量达峰的重要基础. 本研究构建了一种重点行业/领域碳达峰路径研究方法,涵盖宏观目标约束、边界和范围确定、宏观需求预测、行业关联耦合四大模块. 该方法提供了在区域经济社会发展和碳达峰目标双约束下,不同行业/领域碳排放达峰的路径优化选择. 在充分考虑国民经济社会发展需求、行业发展技术特点、国内外进出口变化的基础上,宏观预测重点行业/领域发展规模与需求变化,同时结合以技术为核心的MESSAGE模型建立动态反馈机制,分析产业链上下游供需关系,建立行业内、行业间能量流、物质流耦合关系,通过不断迭代优化确立各行业/领域未来发展需求,并建立不同发展情景,综合研判各情景提出重点行业/领域碳达峰目标与路径. 该方法满足国家、省份、城市等不同区域尺度的重点行业/领域碳排放路径分析与减排措施、成本效益、政策保障评估.

     

  • 图  1  CAEP-CP-Sectors我国重点行业/领域碳达峰路径研究框架

    Figure  1.  Framework of key industries/sectors CO2 emission peak path research method based on CAEP-CP-Sectors in China

    图  2  2020—2035年我国钢铁行业不同碳排放情景下的电力消费量

    Figure  2.  Electricity consumption of the iron and steel industry under different scenarios in China

    图  3  不同电力碳排放绩效变化情况下我国钢铁行业的CO2间接排放量

    Figure  3.  Comparison between the indirect CO2 emissions of iron and steel industry under the conditions of considering emission factor changes in power sector or not in China

  • [1] LEVIN K,RICH D.Turning points: trends in countries' reaching peak greenhouse gas emissions over time[J].World Resources Institute,2017(11):1-36.
    [2] 张立,谢紫璇,曹丽斌,等.中国城市碳达峰评估方法初探[J].环境工程,2020,38(11):1-5.

    ZHANG L,XIE Z X,CAO L B,et al.Discussion on evaluation method on carbon dioxide emissions peaking for Chinese cities[J].Environmental Engineering,2020,38(11):1-5.
    [3] 赵明轩,吕连宏,张保留,等.中国能源消费、经济增长与碳排放之间的动态关系[J].环境科学研究,2021,34(6):1509-1522.

    ZHAO M X,LÜ L H,ZHANG B L,et al.Dynamic relationship among energy consumption, economic growth and carbon emissions in China[J].Research of Environmental Sciences,2021,34(6):1509-1522.
    [4] YUE T,LONG R Y,CHEN H,et al.The optimal CO2 emissions reduction path in Jiangsu Province: an expanded IPAT approach[J].Applied Energy,2013,112:1510-1517. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.02.046
    [5] 王金南,蔡博峰,严刚,等.排放强度承诺下的CO2排放总量控制研究[J].中国环境科学,2010,30(11):1568-1572.

    WANG J N,CAI B F,YAN G,et al.Study on carbon dioxide total emission control in the context of emission intensity commitment[J].China Environmental Science,2010,30(11):1568-1572.
    [6] WANG Y,ZHANG C,LU A T,et al.A disaggregated analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve for industrial CO2 emissions in China[J].Applied Energy,2017,190:172-180. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.109
    [7] DONG B Y,MA X J,ZHANG Z L,et al.Carbon emissions, the industrial structure and economic growth: evidence from heterogeneous industries in China[J].Environmental Pollution,2020,262:114322. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114322
    [8] LIU D N,XIAO B W.Can China achieve its carbon emission peaking?a scenario analysis based on STIRPAT and system dynamics model[J].Ecological Indicators,2018,93:647-657. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.049
    [9] GUAN D B,MENG J,REINER D M,et al.Structural decline in China′s CO2 emissions through transitions in industry and energy systems[J].Nature Geoscience,2018,11(8):551-555. doi: 10.1038/s41561-018-0161-1
    [10] ZHANG X,ZHAO X R,JIANG Z J,et al.How to achieve the 2030 CO2 emission-reduction targets for China's industrial sector: retrospective decomposition and prospective trajectories[J].Global Environmental Change,2017,44:83-97. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.03.003
    [11] ZHENG J L,MI Z F,COFFMAN D,et al.Regional development and carbon emissions in China[J].Energy Economics,2019,81:25-36. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.03.003
    [12] 周健,崔胜辉,林剑艺,等.基于LEAP模型的厦门交通能耗及大气污染物排放分析[J].环境科学与技术,2011,34(11):164-170. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6504.2011.11.034

    ZHOU J,CUI S H,LIN J Y,et al.LEAP based analysis of transport energy consumption and air pollutants emission in Xiamen City[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2011,34(11):164-170. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6504.2011.11.034
    [13] 吕晨,李艳霞,杨楠,等.道路机动车温室气体排放评估与情景分析: 以北京市为例[J].环境工程,2020,38(11):25-32.

    LV C,LI Y X,YANG N,et al.Assessment and scenario analysis of on-road vehicle greenhouse gases emission: a case study of Beijing[J].Environmental Engineering,2020,38(11):25-32.
    [14] 刘惠,王真,曹丽斌,等.基于LEAP模型的鹤壁市农村生活碳排放研究[J].环境科学与技术,2020,43(11):25-35.

    LIU H,WANG Z,CAO L B,et al.Research of rural living carbon emission in Hebi based on LEAP model[J].Environmental Science & Technology (China),2020,43(11):25-35.
    [15] 李新,路路,穆献中,等.基于LEAP模型的京津冀地区钢铁行业中长期减排潜力分析[J].环境科学研究,2019,32(3):365-371.

    LI X,LU L,MU X Z,et al.Emission reduction potential of pollutants emissions from iron and steel industry over Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region based on LEAP[J].Research of Environmental Sciences,2019,32(3):365-371.
    [16] 黄莹,郭洪旭,廖翠萍,等.基于LEAP模型的城市交通低碳发展路径研究:以广州市为例[J].气候变化研究进展,2019,15(6):670-683.

    HUANG Y,GUO H X,LIAO C P,et al.Study on low-carbon development path of urban transportation sector based on LEAP model:take Guangzhou as an example[J].Climate Change Research,2019,15(6):670-683.
    [17] BAUER N,CALVIN K,EMMERLING J,et al.Shared socio-economic pathways of the energy sector-quantifying the narratives[J].Global Environmental Change,2017,42:316-330. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.006
    [18] CHEN X,SHUAI C Y,WU Y,et al.Analysis on the carbon emission peaks of China's industrial, building, transport, and agricultural sectors[J].Science of the Total Environment,2020,709:135768. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135768
    [19] LIU Z,GUAN D B,WEI W,et al.Reduced carbon emission estimates from fossil fuel combustion and cement production in China[J].Nature,2015,524(7565):335-338. doi: 10.1038/nature14677
    [20] 赵明轩,吕连宏,王深,等.中国碳达峰路径的meta回归分析[J].环境科学研究,2021,34(9):2056-2064.

    ZHAO M X,LÜ L H,WANG S,et al.Meta regression analysis of pathway of peak carbon emissions in China[J].Research of Environmental Sciences,2021,34(9):2056-2064.
    [21] 李艳红.山东省碳减排系统仿真及政策优化研究[J].环境工程技术学报,2020,10(1):150-159. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20190063

    LI Y H.System simulation and policy optimization of carbon emission reduction in Shandong Province[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2020,10(1):150-159. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20190063
    [22] HUPPMANN D,GIDDEN M,FRICKO O,et al.The MESSAGEix integrated assessment model and the ix modeling platform (ixmp): an open framework for integrated and cross-cutting analysis of energy, climate, the environment, and sustainable development[J].Environmental Modelling & Software,2019,112:143-156.
    [23] ZHANG S H,YI B W,WORRELL E,et al.Integrated assessment of resource-energy-environment Nexus in China's iron and steel industry[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2019,232:235-249. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.392
    [24] CUI R Y,HULTMAN N,CUI D Y,et al.A plant-by-plant strategy for high-ambition coal power phase out in China[J].Nature Communications,2021,12:1468. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21786-0
    [25] CUI R Y,HULTMAN N,EDWARDS M R,et al.Quantifying operational lifetimes for coal power plants under the Paris goals[J].Nature Communications,2019,10:4759. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12618-3
    [26] 马丁,陈文颖.基于中国TIMES模型的碳排放达峰路径[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2017,57(10):1070-1075.

    MA D,CHEN W Y.China's carbon emissions peak path:based on China TIMES model[J].Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology),2017,57(10):1070-1075.
    [27] LUGOVOY O,FENG X Z,GAO J,et al.Multi-model comparison of CO2 emissions peaking in China: lessons from CEMF 01 study[J].Advances in Climate Change Research,2018,9(1):1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.accre.2018.02.001
    [28] ZHOU N,PRICE L,DAI Y D,et al.A roadmap for China to peak carbon dioxide emissions and achieve a 20% share of non-fossil fuels in primary energy by 2030[J].Applied Energy,2019,239:793-819. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.154
    [29] 蔡博峰,曹丽斌,雷宇,等.中国碳中和目标下的二氧化碳排放路径[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2021,31(1):7-14.

    CAI B F,CAO L B,LEI Y,et al.China′s carbon emission pathway under the carbon neutrality target[J].China Population, Resources and Environment,2021,31(1):7-14.
    [30] 汪旭颖,李冰,吕晨,等.中国钢铁行业二氧化碳排放达峰路径研究[J].环境科学研究,2021.doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2021.11.11.

    WANG X Y,LI B,LV C,et al.China's iron and steel industry carbon emissions peak pathways[J].Research of Environmental Sciences,2021.doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2021.11.11.
  • 加载中
图(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1334
  • HTML全文浏览量:  154
  • PDF下载量:  703
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-09-29
  • 修回日期:  2021-10-27
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-03-07

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回