不同保洁工艺对道路尘负荷与扬尘控制效率差异的影响研究

李冬; 薛占刚; 刘善文; 高健; 朱健忠; 李贤芳; 陈建华

doi:10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2022.04.05

不同保洁工艺对道路尘负荷与扬尘控制效率差异的影响研究

doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2022.04.05

李冬^{1, 4,},
薛占刚²,
刘善文³,
高健^1, ,,
朱健忠²,
李贤芳³,
陈建华¹

1.
中国环境科学研究院，环境基准与风险评估国家重点实验室，北京　100012
2.
傲蓝得环境科技有限公司，河南郑州　451482
3.
山东诺方电子科技有限公司，山东济南　250001
4.
暨南大学环境与气候研究院，广东广州　511436

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(No.42075182)；国家重点研发计划项目(No.2019YFC0214200)；大气重污染成因与治理攻关项目(No.DQGG0304-05)

详细信息

作者简介:
李冬（1994-），男，吉林吉林人，lidong@stu2021.jnu.edu.cn

通讯作者:
高健(1979-)，男，山东潍坊人，研究员，博士，主要从事大气环境化学及污染机理研究，gaojian@craes.org.cn

中图分类号: X513
计量
- 文章访问数: 265
- HTML全文浏览量: 74
- PDF下载量: 75
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-10-20
- 修回日期: 2022-03-24

Effect of Various Road Cleaning Measures on Road Dust Silt Loading and Control Efficiency

1.
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
2.
Our Land Environmental Technology Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 451482, China
3.
Shandong Nova Technology Co., Ltd., Jinan 250001, China
4.
Institute for Environmental and Climate Research, Jinan University, Guangzhou 511436, China

Funds: National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.42075182)；National Key Research and Development Program of China (No.2019YFC0214200)；National Research Program for Key Issues in Air Pollution Control, China (No.DQGG0304-05)

摘要

摘要: 为评估城市道路扬尘治理效果及精准治理道路扬尘，于2020年10月—2021年2月对河南省郑州市城区典型道路的积尘负荷和道路扬尘浓度进行测定，计算了不同类型保洁工艺的扬尘控制效率，分析了典型的湿式保洁工艺实施后的道路扬尘浓度变化. 结果表明：①各种保洁工艺的平均扬尘控制效率受保洁时间、环境温度和相对湿度等因素影响. 实施保洁工艺后1 h内扬尘控制效率平均值为23%～47%，在1～2 h内扬尘控制效率为20%～40%，在2～2.5 h内扬尘控制效率为5%～27%，3 h后路面积尘基本恢复原有水平. 扬尘控制效率与环境温度、相对湿度均呈弱相关. 日气温较高时，会加速路面水分蒸发，进而导致湿式作业的扬尘控制效率较低. ②不同类型保洁工艺控制效率存在差异. 在1 h内混合作业的扬尘控制效率(37%～51%)最高，湿式作业的扬尘控制效率(11%～48%)次之，干式作业的扬尘控制效率(5%～19%)最低，原因在于各类保洁工艺的除尘和抑尘能力不同. ③湿式作业干燥后可有效控制路面积尘和道路扬尘约1 h. 洒水量会影响控尘效果，冬季降低洒水量(防止道路结冰)作业的控制道路扬尘效果较差. 研究显示，道路积尘负荷及扬尘控制效率受保洁工艺、保洁作业时间、环境温度、相对湿度和季节变化等多因素影响，在控制和治理城市道路扬尘时应综合考虑这些因素.
- 道路扬尘 /
- 积尘负荷 /
- PM₁₀ /
- 控制效率 /
- 郑州市
Abstract: In order to evaluate the effect of road dust control and accurately control road dust, the silt load and road dust concentration on typical roads in Zhengzhou City, Henan Province were measured from October 2020 to February 2021. The dust control efficiency of various cleaning measures were calculated, and the variation of road dust concentration after a typical wet cleaning measure was analyzed. The results showed that: (1) Cleaning time, ambient temperature, relative humidity and some other factors all have an impact on the average control efficiency. The average control efficiency is approximately 23%-47% within 1 h, 20%-40% within 1-2 h, 5%-27% within 2-2.5 h, and the dust on the road surface returns to its original level after three hours. The control efficiency has a weak correlation with ambient temperature and relative humidity. When the daily air temperature rises, the evaporation of moisture on the road surface accelerates, resulting in a reduction in control efficiency. (2) The control efficiency varies with different types of cleaning measures. The mixed cleaning measures were the most efficient (37%-51%), followed by wet cleaning measures (11%-48%) and dry cleaning measures (5%-19%). The reason behind this is that different cleaning measures have variable dust removal and dust suppression capacities. (3) Wet cleaning measures can effectively control road dust for approximately 1 h after drying. The amount of sprayed water has an effect on dust control, because reducing the amount of sprayed water in winter (prevent road icing) reduces the control efficiency. The research results reveal that road dust loading and dust control efficiency are affected by cleaning measures, cleaning time, ambient temperature, relative humidity and seasonal changes, and these factors should be comprehensively considered in the control and management of urban road dust.
- road dust /
- silt loading /
- PM₁₀ /
- control efficiency /
- Zhengzhou City

HTML全文

图 1 监测路段示意

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the monitoring roads

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 保洁工艺实施后不同时间内道路扬尘控制效率的变化规律

Figure 2. Time series changes of road dust control efficiency after various cleaning measures

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 道路扬尘控制效率随温度和相对湿度的变化情况

Figure 3. Relationship between dust control efficiency and temperature and relative humidity

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 不同类型道路保洁工艺的道路扬尘控制效率

Figure 4. Road dust control efficiency of different types of cleaning measures

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 基于不同路段的道路扬尘控制效率分析

Figure 5. Analysis of road dust control efficiency on different roads

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 道路积尘负荷和扬尘浓度随路面干燥后的时间变化规律

Figure 6. Variation of the silt loading and dust concentrations with time after road surface drought

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 湿式作业中“后洒”和“后喷雾”作业模式下道路扬尘浓度变化

Figure 7. Variations of road dust concentrations under ‘post-scattering’ and ‘post-spraying’ operation modes in wet cleaning measures

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(29)

[1]	李冬,陈建华,张月帆,等.道路扬尘检测方法研究进展[J].环境工程技术学报,2021,11(3):537-545. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200213 LI D,CHEN J H,ZHANG Y F,et al.Research progress of detection methods of road dust[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2021,11(3):537-545. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200213
[2]	CLAIBORN C,MITRA A,ADAMS G,et al.Evaluation of PM₁₀ emission rates from paved and unpaved roads using tracer techniques[J].Atmospheric Environment,1995,29(10):1075-1089. doi: 10.1016/1352-2310(95)00046-2
[3]	江澜.邯郸市城市道路尘来源解析及对策研究[J].山西建筑,2011,37(5):208-209. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6825.2011.05.125 JIANG L.On analysis of dust origins of urban roads in Handan and their strategies[J].Shanxi Architecture,2011,37(5):208-209. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6825.2011.05.125
[4]	颜敏.首尔市大气污染治理经验及借鉴[J].环境科学导刊,2018,37(4):6-9. YAN M.Experience and enlightenment of air pollution control in Seoul City[J].Environmental Science Survey,2018,37(4):6-9.
[5]	郑灿利,范雪璐,董娴,等.贵阳市秋冬季PM_2.5中重金属污染特征、来源解析及健康风险评估[J].环境科学研究,2020,33(6):1376-1383. ZHENG C L,FAN X L,DONG X,et al.Characteristics,sources and health risk assessment of heavy metals in PM_2.5 collected between autumn and winter in Guiyang City[J].Research of Environment Sciences,2020,33(6):1376-1383.
[6]	张启钧,吴琳,张衍杰,等.隧道环境PM_2.5载带重金属污染特征与健康风险[J].中国环境科学,2018,38(12):4706-4712. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2018.12.039 ZHANG Q J,WU L,ZHANG Y J,et al.Characteristics and health risk assessment of heavy metal in PM_2.5 in tunnel environment[J].China Environmental Science,2018,38(12):4706-4712. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2018.12.039
[7]	钟萍,张家泉,占长林,等.华中冶金工业走廊表层土壤、道路尘重金属污染特征及健康风险[J].环境化学,2019,38(1):87-96. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2018020103 ZHONG P,ZHANG J Q,ZHAN C L,et al.Heavy metal pollution characteristics and health risks of topsoil and road dust in central China metallurgical industry corridor[J].Environmental Chemistry,2019,38(1):87-96. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2018020103
[8]	郭硕,肖捷颖,刘娟,等.石家庄市冬季城市道路积尘负荷排放特征研究[J].环境科学与技术,2017,40(2):163-167. GUO S,XIAO J Y,LIU J,et al.Silt loading characteristic of Shijiazhuang City paved road in winter based on sample plot method[J].Environmental Science & Technology (China),2017,40(2):163-167.
[9]	张伟,姬亚芹,李树立,等.天津市春季典型道路积尘负荷分布特征[J].中国环境监测,2018,34(1):54-59. ZHANG W,JI Y Q,LI S L,et al.The distribution characteristics of silt loading of typical roads in Tianjin during spring[J].Environmental Monitoring in China,2018,34(1):54-59.
[10]	王刘铭,王西岳,王明仕,等.焦作市大气污染时空分布特征及来源分析[J].环境科学研究,2020,33(4):820-830. WANG L M,WANG X Y,WANG M S,et al.Spatial and temporal distribution and potential source of atmospheric pollution in Jiaozuo City[J].Research of Environment Sciences,2020,33(4):820-830.
[11]	樊守彬,田刚,程水源.移动式路面尘负荷测试系统及应用[J].环境科学与技术,2012,35(3):139-142. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6504.2012.03.030 FAN S B,TIAN G,CHENG S Y.Spatial distributions of road silt loading based on mobile monitoring system[J].Environmental Science & Technology (China),2012,35(3):139-142. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6504.2012.03.030
[12]	黄玉虎,李东晨,秦建平,等.道路积尘湿式采样器研发与测试评价[J].环境工程学报,2017,11(3):1975-1980. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201511094 HUANG Y H,LI D C,QIN J P,et al.Developing and test evaluating of wet road dust sampler[J].Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering,2017,11(3):1975-1980. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201511094
[13]	CHEN J H,ZHENG H F,WANG W,et al.Resuspension method for road surface dust collection and aerodynamic size distribution characterization[J].China Particuology,2006,4(6):300-303. doi: 10.1016/S1672-2515(07)60279-6
[14]	樊守彬,杨涛,王凯,等.道路扬尘排放因子建立方法与应用[J].环境科学,2019,40(4):1664-1669. FAN S B,YANG T,WANG K,et al.Methods and application of road fugitive dust emission factor localization[J].Environmental Science,2019,40(4):1664-1669.
[15]	翟绍岩,乐群,魏海萍,等.扬尘估算的采样方法对比[J].环境科学与管理,2007,32(11):122-124. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1212.2007.11.034 ZHAI S Y,YUE Q,WEI H P,et al.The comparison of field sampling methods for dust emission estimating[J].Environmental Science and Management,2007,32(11):122-124. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1212.2007.11.034
[16]	朱振宇,张诗建,张亚飞,等.道路交通扬尘采样方法研究进展[J].环境与可持续发展,2014,39(1):41-45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-288X.2014.01.014 ZHU Z Y,ZHANG S J,ZHANG Y F,et al.Research progress on the sampling methods of road traffic dust[J].Environment and Sustainable Development,2014,39(1):41-45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-288X.2014.01.014
[17]	谢磊,丁艳纯,史玲.衡阳市主城区道路扬尘排放特征及影响因素[J].环境保护与循环经济,2019,39(4):69-74. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1021.2019.04.019
[18]	祝嘉欣,成海容,虎彩娇,等.武汉市道路扬尘源排放清单及空间分布特征研究[J].南京信息工程大学学报(自然科学版),2018,10(5):557-562. ZHU J X,CHENG H R,HU C J,et al.Study on the load distribution characteristics and source emission inventory of road dust in the city of Wuhan[J].Journal of Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology (Natural Science Edition),2018,10(5):557-562.
[19]	陈筱佳,程金平,江璇,等.上海市中心城区主干道道路扬尘组分特征及来源解析[J].环境污染与防治,2015,37(6):10-13. CHEN X J,CHENG J P,JIANG X,et al.Study on the chemical compositions characteristics and source apportionment in road dust of main roads in Shanghai central district[J].Environmental Pollution & Control,2015,37(6):10-13.
[20]	张伟,姬亚芹,张军,等.辽宁省典型城市道路尘PM_2.5成分谱研究[J].中国环境科学,2018,38(2):412-417. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2018.02.002 ZHANG W,JI Y Q,ZHANG J,et al.Study on the road dust source profile of PM_2.5 in Liaoning Province typical cities[J].China Environmental Science,2018,38(2):412-417. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2018.02.002
[21]	李冬,陈建华,张凯,等.保定市春季道路扬尘颗粒物中碳组分特征及来源分析[J].环境污染与防治,2020,42(10):1293-1297. LI D,CHEN J H,ZHANG K,et al.Characteristics and source apportionment of carbon components in road dust particles of Baoding during spring[J].Environmental Pollution & Control,2020,42(10):1293-1297.
[22]	彭康,杨杨,郑君瑜,等.珠江三角洲地区铺装道路扬尘排放因子与排放清单研究[J].环境科学学报,2013,33(10):2657-2663. PENG K,YANG Y,ZHENG J Y,et al.Emission factor and inventory of paved road fugitive dust sources in the Pearl River Delta Region[J].Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae,2013,33(10):2657-2663.
[23]	樊守彬,张东旭,田灵娣,等.北京市交通扬尘PM_2.5排放清单及空间分布特征[J].环境科学研究,2016,29(1):20-28. FAN S B,ZHANG D X,TIAN L D,et al.Emission inventory and spatial distribution of road fugitive dust PM_2.5 in Beijing[J].Research of Environmental Sciences,2016,29(1):20-28.
[24]	CHEN S Y,ZHANG X R,LIN J T,et al.Fugitive road dust PM_2.5 emissions and their potential health impacts[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2019,53(14):8455-8465.
[25]	LI B,MA L X,SUN S J,et al.Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their nitro-derivatives in urban road dust across China:spatial variation,source apportionment,and health risk[J].Science of the Total Environment,2020,747:141194. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141194
[26]	张月帆,陈建华,李冬,等.道路扬尘控制措施及其效率评估研究进展[J].环境工程技术学报,2021,11(5):845-854. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200280 ZHANG Y F,CHEN J H,LI D,et al.Research progress of road dust control measures and their efficiency evaluation[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2021,11(5):845-854. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20200280
[27]	任建宁,高健,秦孝良,等.基于传感器技术的渭南市道路环境颗粒物污染特征及影响因素研究[J].环境科学研究,2021,34(7):1592-1601. REN J N,GAO J,QIN X L,et al.Pollution characteristics and its impact factors of particulate matter in street canyon of Weinan based on PM sensor[J].Research of Environmental Sciences,2021,34(7):1592-1601.
[28]	彭康.珠江三角洲铺装道路扬尘源污染物排放及特征研究[D].广州:华南理工大学,2013:20-31.
[29]	秦孝良,侯鲁健,高健,等.基于移动传感器的城市道路颗粒物污染特征[J].中国环境科学,2020,40(3):948-955. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2020.03.003 QIN X L,HOU L J,GAO J,et al.Pollution characteristics of particulate matter in urban roads:high spatial and temporal resolution monitoring based on mobile sensors[J].China Environmental Science,2020,40(3):948-955. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2020.03.003