填埋场地下水溶解性有机物时空分布特征分析——以四川红层区某生活垃圾填埋场为例
Spatiotemporal Distribution of Dissolved Organic Matter in the Groundwater Near the Municipal Solid Waste Landfill in Red Bed Zone——A Case Study of a Landfill in the Sichuan Province
-
摘要: 溶解性有机物(DOM)是生活垃圾填埋场地下水的主要污染物之一,但红层区填埋场地下水中DOM的特征尚不明晰。因此,本文结合我国典型红层区某生活垃圾填埋场地下水的现场调研,运用三维荧光光谱技术,研究了生活垃圾填埋场地下水DOM的来源、组成和时空分布。结果表明,调查区除填埋场地下水导排井(DP17)、污染扩散监测井(KS2~ KS6)和水产源监测井(SC8)地下水中CODMn(Pi(标)=1.323~5.392)以及SC8井中的Mn2 (Pi(标)=1.140)外,TN、TP、Fe、Cd、Hg和Cr(Pi(标)=0.001~0.587)均未超过地下水环境质量Ⅲ类标准;但相对于背景井(BJ1),各污染物的Pi(背)介于0.703到142.991之间,已受到不同污染源的影响。SC8地下水中TP(Pi(背)=34.719)明显高于BJ1和其他监测井,混合污染源监测井(包括农业区和生活区污染源)中TP(Pi(背)=7.812)明显高于农业面源监测井(Pi(背)=1),因此TP可作为水产源(SC8)和生活区地下水中的特征污染物;污染扩散监测井(KS2~KS6)、混合污染源监测井(HH9~HH16)、农业面源监测井(NY7)中TN的Pi(背)介于2.103~5.169之间,调查区地下水已受到不同氮污染源的影响.填埋场渗滤液及附近地下水中DOM包括类胡敏酸和类富里酸等腐殖质类物质,及类色氨酸蛋白质类物质。填埋场地下水中DOM污染主要集中在填埋场附近,可知地下水导排层能有效减小对地下水的影响;地下水中DOM的腐殖化程度在丰水期(HIX平均=3.99)和枯水期(HIX平均=10.69)具有显著性差异;地下水导排层监测井中类胡敏酸和类富里酸的荧光强度分别是其他污染源的3.1~11.9和1.9~8.3倍,可作为填埋场地下水DOM污染的指示性指标。Abstract: Dissolved organic matter (DOM) is one of the main pollutants in the groundwater of municipal solid waste landfills (MSWLs). However, the DOM characteristics in the groundwater of MSWLs in the red bed zone are still unclear. Therefore, the source, the composition and the spatiotemporal distribution of DOM in the groundwater of MSWLs were studied with fluorescence excitation-emission matrix spectra, based on the field investigation in a typical red bed zone of China. Results indicate that the concentration of TN, TP, Fe, Cd, Hg and Cr (Pi(standard)=0.001~0.587), except CODMn ( Pi(standard)=1.323~5.392 ), in the groundwater of the landfill groundwater diversion well (DP17), the monitoring well of the landfill groundwater contamination diffusion (KS2~KS6) and the monitoring well of the aquatic groundwater contamination (SC8) could meet the class Ⅲ limits of groundwater quality. Besides, the Mn in the SC8 well (Pi(standard)=1.140) exceeded the limit. Compared to the background well (BJ1), the Pi (background) of pollutants in the groundwater ranged from 0.703 to 142.991. It is indicated that the groundwater in the investigated zone had been affected by different pollution sources. The concentration of TP in the SC8 (Pi(background)=34.719) was greatly higher than that in BJ1 and other monitoring wells. The TP in the monitoring wells of mixed pollution sources (HH) including both the agricultural and the living pollution source (Pi(background)=7.812) was also obviously higher than that in the monitoring well of agricultural pollution source (NY7, Pi(background)=1). Therefore, the TP can be used as a groundwater characteristic pollutant derived from the aquatic source and the living source. The groundwater had been affected by different nitrogen sources in the investigated zone due to the Pi (background) of TN in the NY7 well, the KS2~KS6 wells and the HH9~HH16 wells was between 2.103 and 5.169. The DOM in the landfill leachate and in the nearby groundwater included the humic-like substances, the fulvic-like substances and the tryptophan-like protein substances. The groundwater contamination of DOM derived from the landfill was just limited to its vicinity. It is inferred that the groundwater diversion well could effectively reduce the impact of leachate leakage on the groundwater. There was a significant difference of DOM humification degree in groundwater between in wet season (HIX average = 3.99) and dry season (HIX average = 10.69). The fluorescence intensity of the humic acid and the fulvic acid in the DP17 well were 3.1~11.9 and 1.9~8.3 times higher than the monitoring wells of other pollution sources, respectively. Therefore, they can be used as indicative pollutants for the groundwater contamination of DOM derived from the MSWLs.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 107
- HTML全文浏览量: 18
- PDF下载量: 10
- 被引次数: 0