基于地下水入渗地下室情景的蒸气入侵暴露模型研究

Vapor Intrusion Model Based on Groundwater Infiltration Basement Scenario

  • 摘要: 为科学评估地下水入渗地下室情景下的蒸气入侵过程,以苯和三氯乙烯为目标污染物,通过构建地下水入渗地下室情景下的概念模型,综合考虑地下水经孔隙渗透、裂隙渗透的入渗量,以及符合GB 50108—2008《地下工程防水技术规范》情景(简称“符合规范情景”)和最不利情景的蒸发量,计算得到地下水暴露量及室内空气中VOCs浓度,并与HJ 25.3—2019《建设用地土壤污染风险评估技术导则》(简称“《导则》”)规定暴露模型计算结果进行对比. 结果表明:①在地下水埋深至地下室底板的距离为25~200 cm时,经裂缝渗透和经孔隙渗透的入渗量分别为3.86~37.7和1.55×10−4~2.35×10−3 m3/d,符合规范情景和最不利情景的蒸发量分别为2.30×10−3和0.30~0.52 m3/d;在地下水埋深至地下室底板的距离不变的情况下,经裂缝渗透的入渗量约为经孔隙渗透的15 000~25 000倍. 对比不同情景下入渗量和蒸发量发现,以入渗后地下水全部蒸发达到稳定状态作为合理保守假设,建议选择蒸发量作为地下水暴露量. ②在地下水入渗地下室模型中,室内空气中苯和三氯乙烯的浓度计算结果一致,在蒸发量符合规范情景和最不利情景下结果均分别为1.25×10−3和0.16~0.28 mg/m3. 在《导则》规定暴露模型下,室内苯和三氯乙烯浓度分别为7.01×10−4~7.21×10−4和9.52×10−4~9.80×10−4 mg/m3. 在蒸发量符合规范情景和最不利情景下,地下水入渗地下室模型计算的室内空气中VOCs浓度分别是《导则》规定暴露模型计算结果的1~2和100~400倍. 研究显示,在地下水位较浅的地区开展风险评估时,需考虑地下水入渗地下室情景,避免直接套用《导则》规定暴露模型从而低估污染地下水对人群的实际健康风险.

     

    Abstract: To scientifically assess the vapor intrusion under the scenario of groundwater infiltration in the basement, benzene and trichloroethylene were selected as target pollutants. Groundwater exposure and indoor air concentration of VOCs were calculated by developing a conceptual model that considers groundwater fracture infiltration, pore infiltration, and evaporation in compliance with the Technical Code for Waterproofing of Underground Works (GB 50108—2008) and the worst case scenarios. The indoor air concentrations of pollutants were compared with the results calculated by Technical Guidelines for Risk Assessment of Soil Contamination of Land for Construction (HJ 25.3-2019). The results suggested that: (1) When the distance from the groundwater table to the basement floor was 25-200 cm, the fracture infiltration and the pore infiltration was 3.86-37.7 and 1.55×10−4-2.35×10−3 m3/d, respectively. The evaporation rate in compliance with the GB 50108—2008 and in the worst case scenario was 2.30×10−3 and 0.30-0.52 m3/d, respectively. For the same distance from the groundwater table to the basement floor, fracture infiltration was about 15,000-25,000 times that of pore infiltration. After comparing the amount of infiltration and evaporation under different scenarios, the evaporation was recommended as the groundwater volume of exposure under the reasonable assumption that all groundwater can evaporate after infiltration in a steady-state. (2) The indoor air concentrations of benzene and trichloroethylene were consistent under the groundwater infiltration in the basement model. The concentration was 1.25×10−3 mg/m3 when evaporation in compliance with the GB 50108—2008 and it was 0.16-0.28 mg/m3 when evaporation under the most unfavorable scenario. Under the HJ 25.3-2019 recommended exposure model, the indoor air concentrations of benzene and trichloroethylene were 7.01×10−4-7.21×10−4 mg/m3 and 9.52×10−4-9.80×10−4 mg/m3, respectively. In the scenario of groundwater evaporation in compliance with the GB 50108—2008 and the worst case, the indoor air concentrations calculated by the groundwater infiltration model were about 1-2 times and 100-400 times that of those calculated by the HJ 25.3-2019 recommended exposure model, respectively. The results indicated that when conducting risk assessments in areas with shallow groundwater tables, it is necessary to consider the exposure of groundwater infiltration in the basement scenario instead of using the guideline model directly, which could underestimate the actual health risk from contaminated groundwater.

     

/

返回文章
返回